#OpExposeCPS Las Vegas NV: Illuminating the Historical Context of Corruption in Operations of Justice in Family Court ~ Clark County Nevada

Dear Sisters and Brothers of #OpExposeCPS in Las Vegas NV:

I'd like to share with you a collection of articles done by the Las Vegas Tribune, reporting on the depth in on-going corruption within operations of the Eighth District Court and Justice Courts serving your community.  Be aware that all of the issues presented have touched your cases one way or another, and have been continuously operating in the background, possibly a contributing influence to any and all adverse impacts upon family that each of you may be dealing with at the current time.  In the event that you are not aware of these on-going issues, I am sharing the information I have collected recently on the topic.  The reporting highlights who the "players" in justice have been historically, the current issues they are now faced with, and persistent conflicts of interest that prevent them from serving in any capacity to evaluate and recommend resolutions to same, as they themselves are responsible for these life-destroying conditions that have come out of family court proceedings the community faces in the present day.

Other than blog sources, the Tribune is the only news media that has covered corruption historically for the Clark County community.  Unfortunately, the Review Journal, with massive state-wide presence, only reports "after-the-fact" of something, never digging deeper into readily apparent "funny business" --- and there's been a lot of it --- going on for decades within the hallowed hell-halls of justice among and between it's empowered agents. This kind of "blind journalism" has been a contributing factor to the endurance and entrenchment of corruption found to be operating widespread in public-service sectors for your community.

Three intertwining issues emerge from this series of news reports:

(1)   The destruction of evidence in domestic violence and child abuse cases.  This led to some children being placed into sole custody of an abusive parent.  Law suits loom on the horizon for your community because of this.

(2)   Errors in court records, said to be NUMEROUS

       (a) Errors in recording of information

             (b) Procedural errors (massive).

      (3)  The courts consistently violate state law in handling numerous custodial issues.

I'm hoping that this one excerpt from the 4/2/15 article cited is enough to get you to read the whole series:  Best offense you can have is to thoroughly know the beast that you are dealing with.

Via Las Vegas Tribune 4/2/15:

This was a criminal act:

In 2015, the Nevada Supreme Court will decide matters affecting cases in which the Eighth Judicial District destroyed criminal evidence and concealed the destruction. Yet, the public will never hear of the Nevada Supreme Court’s decisions.

Here’s why. Two key players in the concealment of the destruction of evidence are Court Clerk and Administrator, Steve Grierson, and former Chief Judge, Thomas Arthur “Art” Ritchie, Junior.
Blatant conflicts of interest:  How many of you have cases with issues of DNA and/or drug testing in the 8th District family Court and/or criminal court, justice court?The Nevada Supreme Court was alerted to the fact that a Henderson business is run by the Grierson and Ritchie families. The business houses a DNA and drug testing lab used in the cases handled by Clerk Grierson and Chief Judge Ritchie. Justice of the Peace, Bita Khamsi, refused to disclose on her application for justice-ship she is involved in the business.And, Nevada Secretary of State, Barbara Cegavske, authorizes the licensing of this business at the same time she is involved in the management of the business.Should the Las Vegas Tribune become privileged to any Nevada Supreme Court decisions, this readership will be alerted.

I urge you, for your own education in getting to "know the beast", to read this series of articles and note how the same "players" names come up over-and-over again, in all the multiple issues noted, that have been historically long term.  It's time to make some changes and you can assist with this through various activities, like #OpExposeCPS scheduled for tomorrow in Las Vegas, June 5th.

Stand strong Brothers and Sisters in Las Vegas for #OpExposeCPS on June 5th.  Arm yourselves with the facts in the judicial history pertaining to corruption in operations of justice and inherent in its administration that should be serving you and your community, instead of conning you out of custody of your children.

12/10/14-Las Vegas Metro Investigates Court

http://lasvegastribune.net/lvmpd-investigates-court/

4/2/15 – LV-Metro Weighs In On Sheriff Lombardo 

(family court situation destruction of evidence -- investigation outcomes)

http://lasvegastribune.net/lvmpd-weighs-sheriff-lombardo/ 

4/2/14 – Blue-Ribbon Kids Commission Final Report-Shows-Work Ahead

http://lasvegastribune.net/blue-ribbon-kids-commission-final-report-shows-work/

5/7/15  - The Pressure is On

http://lasvegastribune.net/pressure/

  

5/13/15 – What’s Behind the Blue Ribbon Panel?

http://lasvegastribune.net/whats-blue-ribbon-panel/

5/18/15:  Civil Rights Violations in Clark County Courts

http://lasvegastribune.net/civil-rights-violations-clark-county-courts/

5/18/15:  Fox Guards the Chicken Coop

(Guardianship issues/DVA and who knew what when)

http://lasvegastribune.net/fox-guards-chicken-coop/

5/30/14~Hearing Master Turns into Little Lamb Via RolandoLarraz (Editor) http://lasvegastribune.net/hearing-master-turns-lamb/ …

About #OpDeathEaters' Objectives and Recent Theoretical Developments in Sociology of Deception

#OpDeathEaters  ~ A global campaign to expose social influence networks that historically have insulated the paedo-sadist industry, directly resulting in institutional insulation of sexual deviance, leaving thousands of victims in its wake across the world, who have yet to receive Justice.  

This post has two objectives:  (1)  Tell you about new #Anon campaign and (2)  To make #Anonymous  aware of  recent theoretical work published in December 2014 American Sociological Association's Journal as framework for interpreting data base collected through #OpDeathEaters .  The complimentary compatibility of (a) problem under scrutiny and (b) this newly available theoretical framework for explaining it (black markets/cons/frauds) could not have been more timely, and may prove to be an invaluable analytical tool in understanding the complex nature of the data collected, in terms of the phenomena under observation .  

Regarding #OpDeathEaters :  (quote)
"The premise behind OpDeathEaters is to expose high level complicity, obstruction of justice and cover-up in the paedo-sadist industry in order to show the need for independent inquiries,” said Miss Marsh.
OpDeathEaters...is intended to break what it says is a conspiracy of silence among sympathetic politicians, police and mainstream media to downplay the full extent of the online child sex industry.....
The database is not meant to find criminals but to show influence networks and how already known cases are distributed across those networks,” Miss Marsh added. “No one can visualize a beach by being presented with periodic, isolated grains of sand.”….
"The high prevalence of white, often middle class establishment professional men among offenders has also contributed to the failure to fully address the problem and the over-arching networks that sustain the child pornography industry, according to Mr Marsh." (end quote)

SOURCE: 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11363303/Anonymous-hackers-turn-fire-on-global-paedophile-menace.html


Recent Theoretical Developments in Sociology of Deception
American Sociological Journal Dec 2014 
A THEORY ON THE SOCIOLOGY OF DECEPTION
Enduring Illusions: The Social Organization of Secrecy and Deception
David R. Gibson1
Citation:  Sociological Theory
2014, Vol. 32(4) 283–306
© American Sociological Association 2014
DOI: 10.1177/0735275114558631

http://www.asanet.org/journals/ST/Dec14STFeature.pdf

"This article lays the foundations of a sociology of deception, focusing on lies and secrets successfully maintained for years or even decades." 

(pg 297)

"There are ways of discerning closely held truths apart from being told outright, by directly observing the actions, objects, or conditions about which lies are spun or secrets are kept." 

(pg 303)
To conclude, secrets and lies are central to all manner of frauds, plots, cabals, cover-ups, black markets, man-made disasters, clandestine projects, and espionage operations. With the occasional exception, we as sociologists have not made a practice of studying such things, which means we have turned away from society’s dark regions in order to search for whatever may be conveniently discovered under the light. That has left us ill-equipped to assist in the discovery of secrets that need to be exposed, and—though this is more controversial— in the protection of those that need to be safeguarded. This article has been an attempt to remedy that deficit and thus to make sociology more pertinent to the urgent concerns of the world.
Acknowledgement:
Downloaded from stx.sagepub.com at ASA - American Sociological Association on January 7, 2015

stx.sagepub.com
http://www.asanet.org/journals/ST/Dec14

ON ABUSE-BY-PROXY, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE/ABUSE, CUSTODY ISSUES AND THE MOVIE ROSEMARY'S BABY - A PRIMER

A Primer for General Public Awareness 

What is Abuse-By-Proxy?

Most of the general public think of Munchhausen's (Abuse-By-Proxy) when they hear this term.  It's one form it can emerge in, but it's not the specific form we'll be dealing with in this post.  Certainly, Munchhausen's clearly demonstrates the two central ingredients for Abuse-By-Proxy:  (a)  Betrayal and (b)  On-going deciept central to an unfolding process.

I like to offer the movie Rosemary's Baby (1968) as a concrete example of this conscious process [1].  In this instance, Abuse-By-Proxy emerges in an intact relationship, in which the husband (via his engagement with neighbors), is slowly embedding his soon-to-be pregnant wife in the world of satanism. She has no clue this has been going on over a 10-month period.  Once she comes to understand the horror of what has really been happening to her, she turns for help to another obstetrician, who ends up not believing her, and returns her to the care of her husband and involved third parties.   Sam Vaknin describes Abuse-By-Proxy as an "insidious process" --- working in the background like a cancerous tumor --- unknown to the targeted victim, until the intended consequences are manifested [2].

Women who are dealing with domestic violence and abuse issues that progress to custodial issues in family court arenas become embedded in similar on-going circumstances in real life, just like Rosemary. Just like Rosemary, the experiences they have endured first-hand while protecting their children from further harm at the hands of an abusive parent --- they are not believed.  In too many instances across the nation, children's own narratives of sexual abuse are judicially ignored.  The very institutional systems publicly empowered to protect both them and their children in the face of these circumstances, become used as "tools" by the offending party for one thing and one thing only --- a personal agenda that has no relational connection to precepts of "best interests of children" [3].  This is where, I believe, COMMON SENSE AND RESOLVING CUSTODY ISSUES needs to be considered judicially.  When this RELATIONAL CONNECTION to precepts of "best interests of children" is absolutely absent as evidenced by legal strategies employed by the offending party, we need to be able to recognize this for what it is, so we can stop its progression to adverse outcomes in judicially rendering a custody determination that in both the short and long run ultimately fails miserably in its own stated purpose --- "best interests of the child".

Simply put at the most general level of description, Abuse-By-Proxy is the use of third parties to do another person's "dirty work", with grounded intentions of deliberate destabilization of a targeted individual's life, for the sole purpose of maintaining control.  For the targeted person in this situation, no area of their life is "off limits" to this intentionally destructive strategy, which can be found fueling contested custody issues in family courts across the nation [4].   In many instances of domestic violence and abuse that end up as contested custody issues, an abusive soon-to-be ex will execute Abuse-By-Proxy game play, for the sole purpose of maintaining control of the situation, the victim, their family life, and consequently any formal legal action(s) that result.  They WILL COVERTLY USE ANY AND ALL available means to have linkages into your personal life via social/personal/professional connections, as this is essential for successful execution of Abuse-By-Proxy processes.  Social media platforms, such as Facebook and LinkedIn, provide fertile grounds for cultivation of these connections, based on affinity fraud (a person pretending to be somebody/something they are not and making contact with you for specific purposes/intents of your abusive ex).   Ultimately, what intentionally transpires are dishonest communications, as Abuse-By-Proxy primarily is a dance of deceit.

The first goal of Abuse-By-Proxy is to get the "targeted individual" locked into a "legal definition" (through the use of third party assistance) that eventually becomes front and center in terms of custodial issues.   The prestaging events for this generally will include fraudulent engagement of child protective services (for example having co-opted neighbors phone in phony child welfare complaints) via filing false reports; filing false reports with law enforcement, and/or perjury for the sole purpose of obtaining a restraining order and/or mental health definition (through all of these same processes).  An abusive ex can be very creative in using your current social circumstances to what ever advantage is presented. This includes using third parties within your immediate environment (such as neighbors) and unleashing viscious rumor spreading, typically casting custody issues in their own favorable light, despite significant domestic violence and abuse issues that are not evident to others in that milieu.  After all, domestic violence and abuse remains to this day the most under-reported crime in America [5].

Once the first goal of Abuse-By-Proxy is achieved and "legally documented" (albeit totally on a deceitful/perjured basis), the abuser and supporters then build their case further upon this initial deceit perpetrated upon all the state-empowered agents who become involved in the unfolding legal-fraud process. This is the initial goal of Abuse-By-Proxy game play.  Once this initial coup d'tat  is accomplished --- and that is what it is in a literal sense because of the fraud the initial action was based on --- three objectives are attained by the "abuser":  (1)  Legal sanctification for their standing; (2)  Complete obscuration of the fact that the targeted victims Constitutional and Civil Rights were initially violated by the "abuser" in coming to this "legal victory" (as the justice system has been engaged on the basis of fraud), and (3)  Complete burying of the fact that there was VIOLATIVE BEHAVIOR (rule-breaking conduct) ON THE PART OF THE ABUSER.  Consequently, they are never held accountable for their actions and they continue to abuse --- if not the mom directly, then it will be the children and eventually the mom through the children.  As such, from where I stand, this is where CIVIL GOES CRIMINAL --- as Abuse-By-Proxy is in its very essence conspiracy --- with the grounded intention to defraud a civil legal process [6].

Abuse-By-Proxy is a psycho-social dynamic process that can be depended upon to render specific outcomes; most notably, the severance of any healthy emotional bonds the targeted victim may have in their immediate social environment.  While recognized as a destructive and corruptive process in custody and divorce issues, it should also be noted that Abuse-By-Proxy, as a social-engaging technique, is relied upon by human traffickers as they lure, ensnare, and trap their cargo.  No individual act of human trafficking can be successfully accomplished, without executing an Abuse-By-Proxy process. This is an important point for the following reason --- it demonstrates the utility of this process for the outcome(s) that are rendered --- i.e., complete severance of any healthy emotional bonds the targeted victim has access to, including impacting the children embedded in corrupted custody processes in the same way in terms of their emotional bonds with the targeted parent. These results are obtained directly from the nature of Abuse-By-Proxy:  (a)  Betrayal and (b) On-going deceit, from which magnified emotional damages emerge over time.   These in turn have their own erosive effects upon the mental health of each individual impacted, eventually being used to the abuser's legal advantage in terms of getting a legal "mental health definition"  and furthering that through court-ordered evaluations with respective outcomes that result from same.  Batterer's who successfully engage Abuse-By-Proxy to drive legal strategies in custody issues (which is essentially legal fraud, as discussed above) eventually acquire "sole custody status", maintaining maximum psyche-damage control and reaping legally beneficial outcomes from its known on-going mental health effects upon the impacted victims, both mothers and children.  Extreme cruelty permeates resultant actions, in many instances sadomasochistically imbued.  Over time this unhealthy emotional dynamic acquires sanctification/legitimization via family court by Abuse-By-Proxy processes literally driving legal strategies of the abusive parent.

When Abuse-By-Proxy process is initiated and gains momentum, it obfuscates pre-existing rule violating conduct of the initial perpetrator(s), extending to violations of codified law in terms of Civil and Constitutional Rights [7].  It's why it's the batterer's preferred technique in custody issues that arise from the presence of domestic violence and abuse within the home --- successful execution of Abuse-By-Proxy renders the batterer removed from accountability for his pre-existing violative actions (rule breaking conduct), while simultaneously placing the targeted victim in what can be extremely unfavorable circumstances in terms of custodial issues, through deliberately orchestrated events with the aid of third parties.

Most women who have endured Abuse-By-Proxy within contested custodial issues have no idea what is happening to them (just like Rosemary, because of its covert nature) --- they only know every aspect of their lives starts to slowly crumble, with devastating life-long consequences --- all because they tried to protect their children. Successful Abuse-By-Proxy processes that end up driving legal strategy in family court ultimately blind judicial reasoning (it's why they are used), as the issue(s) that present have arisen from deliberately orchestrated and engineered events on the part of the batterer, whose sole purpose throughout is destabilization of a targeted person's life, in order to remain in power and control over them and legal outcomes.   The means used to achieve the ends costs us all in terms of scarce available public resources for human services (CPS); law enforcement; court and adjunct services that support family court operations.   It is here where "private issues" (of custody/divorce) become "public concerns", as public resources are squandered on the batterer's personal legal agenda, which is to maintain a position of absolute control, despite known negative outcomes, and the severe negative effects this personal agenda has on quality of life issues for impacted parties, including the children.  It ends up costing all of society in more ways in terms of life-long consequences imposed upon the children these scenarios directly impact.

The above personal observations come from direct experience as a victim of Abuse-By-Proxy over a 17-year-period.  My experiences offer a unique perspective, as they were the direct result of being victimized by the original attorney I retained to represent me in a custody issue that had severe domestic violence and abuse issues at its core.  My personal history in this regard highlights the "corruption component" that replicates via the actions of corrupt attorneys who literally run their legal practices grounded in Abuse-By-Proxy protocols.  In other words, an expert at the game of stacking cards in custody and divorce issues when severe domestic violence and abuse issues are central to the case --- including, but not limited to overt acts of legal fraud, fraud paper filings, and digital record tampering. His ability to successfully accomplish these heinous white collar crimes is directly related to the dysfunctional status of the judiciary in the state of Nevada and its documented history in terms of corruption dating back for over a decade.  Succinctly summarizing the form corruption took in the infamous and on-going Housing Board Fraud Game in Clark County Nevada:  Attorneys become involved in specific issues and covertly create more issues that require their services for resolution (racketeering), just like in the circle game of court referrals that gets kicked into motion via Abuse-By-Proxy driving legal strategies in custody issues.  In the history of my case,  it was nothing short of a conspiracy to defraud custodial rights that was an on-going process over a 17-year-period [8].

In my next post, drawing upon the multiple events that comprise my experience with Abuse-By-Proxy and offering these as exemplars, I'll be covering the red flags that signal it is actively in process in your custody situation via the direct use of third parties, and the many forms this can assume.  Not surprisingly, many of the hallmarks of Abuse-By-Proxy as it emerges in a social situation subtly assume the same form as patterned battering behavior:  (a)  Violation of personal boundaries; (b) Instigation of conflict having no rational basis; (c) Continual re-casting of the original conflict so that you ultimately end up being blamed for it; (d)  Purposeful distortion of communication.  Additionally, I'll be covering strategies to avoid in negotiating custody with your ex, if you are a woman getting out of a domestic violence and abuse situation and are forced to deal with family court for protection, in light of batterer's court strategies directly known to me through these same experiences.  You will see how each of these strategies fits with what has been presented in the current posting.  Put a yellow sticky note to your head continually reminding yourself:  Batterers will NEVER PLAY FAIR.  Was he fair in your relational dealings while you were together?  No --- what makes you think he's going to play fair in the family court arena?  I know.  Been there --- done that --- bought the T-shirt and still wear it to this day, having been bankrupted three times by the process, by pros in Abuse-By-Proxy execution for purposes of custodial interference.

REFERENCES

[1]  Rosemary's Baby (film 1968)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemary's_Baby_(film)

[2]  Sam Vaknin: On - Abuse By Proxy - http://bit.ly/1iFits0

       On - Gaslighting  http://bit.ly/HoHk7X

       On - Ambient Abuse and Gaslighting  http://bit.ly/18QlxvZ

       On- Narcissist in Court and Litigation  http://bit.ly/1glk0Xq

       On - No Custody - No Children  http://bit.ly/1hFoTK8

[3]   Barry Goldstein Time's Up Blog:  (May 2013) Being a Hero Like Mickey Mantel  http://bit.ly/1aVGXe1

   (Sept 2013) The Broken Custody Court System: Is there  Reason for Hope?   http://bit.ly/1dFFqLs

Keith Harmon Snow (May 2012):  A Life Sentence  http://bit.ly/1hboNMt

  Jerome Elam (March 2013) :  Immunity for Guardian Ad Litem Destroys  Connecticut Family  http://bit.ly/HoX4HP

  Connecticut Family Court Corruption (May 2013):  http://bit.ly/17kHolw

Conn. Task Force Reviewing High Legal Costs of Child Custody Cases Amid  Complaints (10/26/13)  http://bit.ly/1aVgwal

  Efforts to silence the Save Mila In Maine Campaign (Jan 2013) ~ DOING  ABUSE-BY-PROXY PUBLICLY WITHOUT SHAME http://bit.ly/19aEVbe

  Propegated on a State-Wide-Basis - South Dakota - The situation of Foster Care/Sexual Exploitation of Children in Native Communities - The Mette  Foster Care            Case Lakota People's Law Project (2013)  http://bit.ly/1757pSO

[4]  Sarah Tyrrell admits to stalking and instrumental in having Lori Handrahan fired  (March 2013)  http://bit.ly/1fpcPx1

  Efforts to silence the Save Mila in Maine Campaign Doing Abuse- By-Proxy without Public Shame (Jan 2013)  http://bit.ly/19aEVbe

[5]  Safe Horizons:  Domestic Violence - Statistics and Facts (2013)   http://bit.ly/1iFEtTU

[6] JonathanTurley.org/By Guest Blogger Charlton Stanley (May 2013):  From DSM-I to DSM-5  in the Legal System: Mental Illness Issues in the Courtroom         http://bit.ly/1glyirj

  New York Times (May 07, 2013):  Psychiatry’s Guide Is Out of Touch With  Science, Experts Say  http://nyti.ms/HvzTMy

  Boston.com by Claudia M Gold  (May 8, 2013):  DSM, NIMH on mental illness:  both miss relational, historical context of being human.  http://bo.st/1a1CiZ1

  The Custody Scam:  Dominique Buccafurri Goes To Washington (May 2013)  http://bit.ly/19rJjTt

Bancroft, L., Silverman, J. G., & Ritchie, D. (2012). The batterer as incest  perpetrator: Lundy Bancroft and Margaret Miller. In SAGE Series on Violence  Against            Women: The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic  violence on family dynamics. (2nd ed., pp. 107-123). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE  Publications, Inc. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452240480.n4

[7]  Las Vegas Tribune:  Federal Judge Slams Door Shut on a Mother’s Attempt to Seek Redress  by Perly Viasmensky (May 29, 2013)  http://bit.ly/1anFTQI

[8]  HawkEyeAndAllies.BlogSpot.com (June 06, 2013):  A CASE OF CORRUPTED CUSTODY  COMBO ~ CLARK COUNTY NEVADA: Lawyer from Hell - Devil for a Judge           - & - A  Justice System  in Purgatory  http://bit.ly/18db00D

  HawkEye on Facebook Status Post (Oct 31, 2013) http://on.fb.me/1hG4iW9

A CASE OF CORRUPTED CUSTODY COMBO ~ CLARK COUNTY NEVADA: Lawyer from Hell - Devil for a Judge - & - A Justice System in Purgatory

Preface:  

All corruption emerges in a specific form ~ The Sacred vs Profane

     Corruption, by virtue of its inherent nature, will always encompass the form Sacred vs Profane.  Corruption, in its totality, are those activities that stand in contradiction to "official public definition of purpose and public expectations" that arise from the definition.  It's the face of the con and the voice of fraud laughing at We The People.

     In my own history and back story of a corrupted custody issue originating in Clark County Nevada 8th District Family Court, the specific form Sacred vs Profane emerged in June 2002 --- remaining to this day, now 11-years having past.  The attorney I retained for my custody issue in Las Vegas back in September of 1997, James E. Smith (Nevada State Bar #0052), had maintained a "friendship" with me via e-mail, after having to flee Vegas with my daughter for Fallon, close to 700 miles to the north, in March of 2002.   

     One of the ways he would engage me was by sending me "scripts" he said he was "sending to his Hollywood agent" (because, oh yes, not only was he an attorney, he was also a writer, who supposedly had a "hollywood agent"), requesting my review and feedback.  I still have that first "script" he ever sent me --- "The Minister".  It's plot line revolved around a "Minister" who lived in up-scale Incline Village NV, in the middle of a nasty divorce and contentious custody case with his wife.  The back-story for the "Minister" himself, was a Heckle/Jyde-schizoid life, split between the pulpit, child pornography production and distribution.  The wife's back-story encompassed protecting her child from the kiddie porn producer/minister, soon to be ex-husband.  I remember e-mailing Jay (and of course --- yes, he will always introduce himself with --- 'Just call me Jay, that's what all my friends call me') and asking him after other pieces he sent me traveled along the same thematic lines:  "Why do all your scripts focus on the seedy side of life?".  He responded:  "I find it fascinating."  The specific form Sacred vs Profane anchors here, in 2002 Fallon. Nevada and its accompanying structural organization can be seen to definitively play out over the next eleven years, expressed in events that came to pass.  

     Little did I know at that point in time (June-September 2002) that he had recently published an e-book:  Through The Eyes of The Accused <http://www.amazon.com/Through-Eyes-Accused-James-Smith/dp/1553693817>.  You should note, this link brings you to information that indicates release date as "07/06/2006" for this publication.  Prior to this, similar-source references on the web indicated a release date 2001-2002, and the description of the work was worded a tad different than in this citation from the link provided above.  As described by the Amazon link: "This book is about a man who was falsely accused of a sex crime. This book is based on a true story....The book is based on true events that happened to the author."  

     Well, this explains what "really happened" to Attorney James E. Smith, when an associated attorney had to be pulled in for my legal representation in May 1999, while simultaneously being in the height of a custody crisis.  What I did not know at this point (May 1999), was that within weeks, the attorney I retained for a custody issue that had severe domestic violence and abuse issues at its core, would be marrying a relative to the opposing party, whom he had been intimately involved with throughout the history of my representation.  All of it explains events that unfolded in Las Vegas that ultimately put both me and my daughter in a position of losing everything and having to flee to Fallon Nevada in March 2002.  

     Flash forward to 2012 --- How did the nonprofit Sattva Metaphysical Center (Hindu-religious) end up running out of the same address (home of James E. Smith ---> http://sattva-metaphysical-center-las-vegas-nv.assistance-from-nonprofits.aidpage.com/ ~&~ another citation for location advertisement http://www.commonkindness.com/org/846537) as a for-profit internet porn site (see http://whois.domaintools.com/sexaesthetics.com).  Once again, the Sacred vs Profane in its purest form, juxtaposed and now exposed.   A better question to get an answer to is, how did the on-line digital record at Secretary of State Nevada website (http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=WRWpu%252bGJ0zqgz14otZw35A%253d%253d&nt7=0) pertaining to nonprofit Sattva Metaphysical Center (whose license was in revoked status February 2012), get changed after being outed on 02/15/12 in LVRJ.com commentary as running out of the same address as a for-profit porn site?  Sometime between 02/15/12 (original outing with documented links to Secretary of State Nevada) and 12/17/12, the on-line record at the above link's information had been changed, in specific regards to the operating address of the organization and officer Anthony Roger Parent, President and Director respectively.  How did these changes happen to the digital record on a nonprofit entity, whose license had been in a REVOKED STATUS at time of outing in February 2012, showing completely different address information by 12/17/12?  Of course, such editing to the "official state on-line records" took care of the problem that was outed --- A registered nonprofit entity (religious) with the Secretary of State Nevada, blatantly operating out of the same address as a registered for-profit (pornographic) business.  

     What I came to learn over the period 2005 through the present was that "editing of official state records" (as illustrated above in the Sattva Metaphysical nonprofit fraud) including adjudicated records within Nevada justice historically, is a common occurrence, particularly in corrupted custody processes that work their way through Family Court.   Specific agents involved with my own custody situation worked in a broader institutional system of justice that has an alarming history marked by massive legal fraud and corruption.  Current arenas of activity include HOA federal investigation with indictments; Family Court Judge Steve Jones 20-count federal indictment for financial fraud dating back over a decade; court-certificate fraud scheme of Attorney Bloomfield/state-empowered agent-juvenile probation officer Chiodini/Brox-owner of court-contracted counseling agency, et al, come to mind right off the top of my head.  Documented histories of reasons various family court judges have been removed from the bench over the past decade also plays in the background (the debenchment of Nichols DelVecchio comes readily to mind), all of it making for an amenable environment for corruption through the use of legal fraud.  Attorneys like James E. Smith and his accompanying paralegal component  Silvianne T. Steinbach (AKA:  Maryse Wagner, who illegally changed her name in 2006 to what it is today, and who also came back to court in 2008 having Smith file a 2nd name change, which was refused by the court) have been able to be successful at what they do (execute corrupted custody processes via the use of Abuse-By-Proxy to drive legal strategy) for precisely this reason.  

If I had known what I know now back in 1999:  I guess I wouldn't be writing this now. 

Today in 2013, I completely understand the situation Victoria Giampa has faced throughout her ordeal, now on appeal, in the hands of the 9th Circuit Court.  <05/29/13 http://lasvegastribune.net/federal-judge-slams-door-shut-mothers-attempt-seek-redress/ & 06/05/13 http://lasvegastribune.net/countys-connection-failure-supervis/>.

Corruption will always assume the form of Sacred vs Profane.  It's the face of the con and the voice of fraud laughing at We The People.

Stay tuned for more installments:  

The Truth Lives Chronicles ~

Part I:  A Case of Corrupted Custody Combo ~ Clark County Nevada ~ 

Lawyer from Hell ~Devil for a Judge ~&~ A Justice System in Purgatory